Live and die in LA response.

If i had to choose between #1 or #2 it would definitely choose #1 because its much better to live a long life and remain known only to a small group of people. Whats wrong with being an average joe? It's way better than living large and dying in your early twenties. Lets just say you're 17 and you "really" had a choice to be rich and die early and a choice between living a long life and being an average joe and you chose to be rich and die in your early 20's thats like 3 years for you to really enjoy being rich. So apparently, you would be better off with number one because theres nothing wrong with living a normal life but there is a problem with dying.I believe that dying has that effect on everybody because no one wants to die. Some people would want the opportunity of being rich and would give anything to get it but whats the point of living large for basically 3 years, it's not worth it. So, my choice is #1 becase it's much better to live a long time and being an average joe.